← Library
Bombay High CourtCAW/1818/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Dinesh S/O. Sadashiv Chaudhary v. The State Of Maharashtra, Through Its Secretary, Dept. Of General Administration And Others

2015-09-10Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.I.S. Cheema1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION W. NO.1818/2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3935/2015 Dinesh s/o Sadashiv Chaudhary ...Versus...

State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Department of General Administration, Mantralaya, Mumbai and others Applicant : Vikas s/o Vasantaji Diwate - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri P.S. Chawhan, Advocate for petitioner Ms N.P. Mehta, AGP for respondent no.1 Ms V. A. Girhe, Adv. h/f Shri H.N. Verma, Adv. for respondent no.2 Shri R.S. Kalangiwale, Advocate for respondent no.3 Shri N.M. Kolhe, Advocate for applicant/intervenor CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.

DATE : 10.09.2015 Heard.

The learned Counsel for the petitioner fairly states that the petitioner would not seek any relief against the applicant and the appointment of the applicant would not be disturbed at the behest of the petitioner.

In view of the aforesaid statement, we reject the prayer made in the civil application.

The civil application stands disposed of accordingly. WRIT PETITION NO.3935/2015 Stand over to 23.09.2015 for further consideration. JUDGE JUDGE Wadkar