← Library
Bombay High CourtFCA/355/2014dispossed offdismiss for default

Shri Pravin Murlidhar Mane v. Sau. Shubhangi Pravin Mane

2015-04-16Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.M. Badar1 pages

FCA355-14 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 355/2014 (PRAVIN MURLIDHAR MANE VERSUS SHUBHANGI PRAVIN MANE) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri M.S. Abbasi, counsel for the appellant.

Shri M.A. Randive, counsel for the respondent. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.M. BADAR, JJ.

DATE : APRIL 16 , 2015.

By this first appeal, the appellant-husband has challenged the judgment of the Family Court rejecting the petition filed by the appellant for grant of decree of divorce. A joint statement is made by the learned counsel for the parties that the parties have started residing together since past six months and, hence, the cause for filing the appeal would not survive. The parties are also personally present in the Court, today and state that they are living together.

In view of the aforesaid statement, we dispose of the appeal with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE