Mohammad Haider @ Parvez Mohammad Tazeem Ansari v. State Of Mah. Thr. Pso Ps Kalmeshwar Dist.Nagpur

ba1122.2021.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BA) 1122 OF 2021 (Mohammad Haidar @ Parvez Mohammad Tazeem Ansari..vs..State, thr PSO, PS, Kalmeshwar, Dist Nagpur) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. D.V. Chauhan, counsel for applicant.

Mr. N.S. Rao, APP for non-applicant /State.

CORAM:

ROHIT B. DEO , J.

DATE: 24.11.2021.

I was not inclined to grant bail.

2.

At this stage, the learned counsel for the applicant submits that instead of passing an elaborate order, the application be dismissed with liberty to the applicant to approach the learned Sessions Judge for bail afresh, if there is no progress in the trial, in the next eight months. 3.

The application is dismissed as withdrawn subject to the liberty as prayed.

4.

The liberty shall be subject to twin conditions. The applicant shall bring this order to the notice of the learned Sessions Judge within the next seven days and the delay, if any, shall not be attributable to the accused or any of them.

Judge Belkhede