Bombay High CourtWP/6820/2014dispossed offdismiss for default

Smt. Vandana W/O Shailendra Brahmne (Ku. Vandana D/O Ramesh Marve) v. Shailendra S/O Pannalal Bramhane

2015-08-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq2 pages

1 wp6820.14

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.6820/2014 Smt. Vandana w/o Shailendra Brahmne (Ku. Vandana d/o Ramesh Marve) ..Versus..

Shailendra s/o Pannalal Bramhane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : Z.A. HAQ, J.

DATE : 28.8.2015 None appears for the petitioner. None for the respondent.

The petitioner has challenged the Clause (4) of the judgment passed by the Family Court in Petition No.A-410/2012 on 24th January, 2014 by which the trial Court has rejected the prayer of the petitioner for return of stridhan/cash.

The impugned order is appeallable under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984.

In view of the availability of alternative statutory remedy, I decline to entertain the petition. The petition is

2 wp6820.14 disposed of accordingly with liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternative statutory remedy, if so advised.

JUDGE Tambaskar.