Dhananjay Maniklal Vishwakarma v. Miss. Urmila D/O Sunderlal Vishwakarma And Others
1 caw1938.15
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.
CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.1938 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2922 OF 2014 (Dhananjay Maniklal Vishwakarma ..vs.. Miss Urmila d/o Sunderlal Vishwakarma and others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri M.S. Sharma, Advocate for the applicants. CORAM : Z.A. HAQ, J.
DATED : 22-09-2015 This is an application filed by the applicants seeking permission to get themselves impleaded in place of the petitioner who has expired. According to the applicants, there is delay in filing the application, however, separate application praying for condonation of delay has not been filed. The civil application is rejected with liberty to the applicants to file proper applications. If the proper applications are not filed within two weeks, the petition shall stand dismissed as abated. JUDGE pma