Amar Rajeshwar Mawle v. The State Of Maharashtra Pso., P.S. Koradi, Nagpur City, Nagpur And Another

2025:BHC-NAG:1505-DB 1/3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 1367 OF 2024 1.

Shri Amar S/o Rajeshwar Mawle Aged about 36 years, Occupation : Government servant 2.

Smt. Rekha Wd/o Rajeshwar Mawle, Aged about 61 years, Occupation : Household R/o Qrt. No. E-145/6, Prakash Nagar Colony, Khaparkheda, Tahsil Saoner, District Nagpur 3.

Shri Vikram S/o Prakash Takle, Aged about - 39 years, Occupation - Business R/o Pratap Nagar, Nagpur ... Applicants // VERSUS // 1.

The State of Maharashtra through Police Station Officer, Police Station Koradi, Nagpur City. Crime No.

21/2023 2.

Ms. Anisha Vijay Singh Age : Major, Occ. Service, R/o S2, Vinayak Apartment, Vinayak Nagar, Hingna Road, Nagpur ... Non-applicants Shri D.R.Golande, Advocate for the applicants. Shri N.H.Joshi, APP for the non-applicant/State. Shri A.R.Prasad, Advocate for the non-applicant no.2. CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI & PRAVIN S. PATIL, JJ.

2/3 DATED : 7th FEBRUARY, 2025.

ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) Heard.

2.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard with consent of parties.

3.

This application filed under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 read with Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure seeks quashing of First Information Report No. 21 of 2023 registered with Police Station Koradi, Nagpur for offence punishable under Sections 120-B, 406, 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

4.

This matter was referred for mediation and as per the report of learned Mediator, mediation is successful. Parties have arrived at a amicable settlement and executed settlement agreement before learned Mediator on 25th October, 2024.

3/3 5.

Learned counsel for non-applicant no.2 confirms the terms of the settlement agreement and entire amount mentioned in the settlement agreement was received by non-applicant no.2 and she has no objection to allow the application.

6.

In view of settlement of dispute, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (i).

7.

Rule is made absolute in the above terms.

[PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.] [NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.]