Bombay High CourtWP/4557/2014dispossed offdismiss for default

Sau. Madhuri W/O Ramesh Uikey And 2 Others v. The State Of Maharashtra, Through Its Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mumbai And 4 Others

2015-06-16Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice C.V. Bhadang1 pages

1 wp4557.14.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.4557 OF 2014 [Sau. Madhuri w/o Ramesh Uikey and others .vs. The State of Maharashtra and others] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri M.I. Dhatrak, counsel for the petitioners, Shri N.R. Rode, AGP for the respondent nos.1 to 4, Shri D.M. Kakani, counsel for the respondent no.5. ..........

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND C.V. BHADANG, JJ.

DATED : JUNE 16, 2015.

Heard.

By this petition, the petitioners seek a direction to the respondent no.1 to immediately release the amount under 'Vaishityapurna Yojna'.

Shri Rode, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondent nos.1 to 4 states that the respondents have already released the amount in favour of the Municipal Council and hence the purpose of filing the writ petition would stand served.

Shri Dhatrak, the learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the statement made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader.

In view of the redressal of the grievance of the petitioners, we dispose of the writ petition, with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE Gulande