← Library
Bombay High CourtAPL/595/2015dismissed

Sau. Pushpa W/O Manoharlal Anandani v. Shyamkumar Hanutaramji Chaudhari And Another

2016-10-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil B. Shukre2 pages

apl.595.15 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Application [APL] No.595 of 2015 (Sau. Pushpa w/o Manoharlal Anandani vs.

Shyamkumar Hanutaramji Chaudhari and another) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Shri A.R. Deshpande, Advocate for Non-Applicant No.1. Shri S.J. Kadu, A.P.P. for Non-Applicant No.2/State.

CORAM

: S.B. SHUKRE, J.

DATE : 19 th OCTOBER, 2016.

Nobody is present on behalf of the applicant. The learned Counsel for non-applicant No.1 and the learned A.P.P. for non-applicant No.2/State are present.

Record shows that ample time and opportunities have been given to the applicant to remove office objections, but in vain. It is obvious that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the application.

The application is dismissed for want of prosecution.

*sdw JUDGE

apl.595.15 2 C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that this order uploaded is a true and correct copy of the original signed order.

Uploaded by: S.D. Waghmare Uploaded on : 20/10/2016 P.A. to the Hon'ble Judge.