Nishatai Rajusing Chavan @ Naik v. Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Washim And Others

cao1533.18 27

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO.1533/2018 IN CROSS OBJECTION ST. NO.15753/2018 IN FA NO.13/2014 Nishatai Rajusing Chavan @ Naik ..vs..

Executive Engineer, Minir Irrigation Division, Washim, District Washim and ors ............................................................................................................................................................................................. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders ............................................................................................................................................................................................. Shri N.M. Kolhe, Counsel for applicant/non-applicant No.1/Cross Objector.

Mrs. U.A. Patil, Counsel for the non-applicant No.1/appellant. Shri Amit Balpande, AGP for non-applicant Nos.2 and 3/State.

CORAM

: V.M. DESHPANDE, J.

DATED : SEPTEMBER 5, 8.

1.

This is an application for condonation of delay in lodging the cross objection.

2.

Heard learned counsel Shri N.M. Kolhe for the cross objector, learned counsel Mrs. U.A. Patil for Executive Engineer, Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation, Washim, and learned Assistant Government Pleader Shri Amit Balpande for the State. 3.

The appeal filed on behalf of the VIDC is already admitted by this Court. In that view of the matter, the civil application is allowed. Delay in lodging the cross objection is .....2/-

cao1533.18 27 hereby condoned. Office to register the cross objection. CROSS OBJECTION ST. NO.15753/2018 1.

Heard.

2.

ADMIT.

3.

Learned counsel Mrs. U.A. Patil waives service for non-applicant No.1-Executive Engineer, Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation, Washim, and learned Assistant Government Pleader Shri Amit Balpande waives service for nonapplicant Nos.2 and 3. 4.

The cross objection was barred by limitation. The delay was about 1601 days. This Court today has allowed Civil Application No.1533/2018. In that view of the matter, it is made clear by consent of cross objector that he will not claim interest on the enhanced compensation if any for the delayed period. 5.

Put up the cross objection along with the first appeal. JUDGE !! BRW !!

...../-