The Commissioner Central Excise, Nagpur v. M/S Siddhabali Ispat, And ANR
1 CEL6.09.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO.6 OF 2009 [The Commissioner Central Excise, Nagpur .vs. M/s. Siddhabali Ispat and one] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri F.T. Mirza, counsel with Shri Anand Deshpande, counsel for the appellant.
..........
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ.
DATED : MARCH 10, 2016.
Shri Mirza, the learned counsel for the appellantDepartment, states that in view of the new policy in regard to the monetary limits below which an appeal cannot be filed, the appellant would not be in a position to prosecute the present appeal. He stated that a pursis seeking permission to withdraw the appeal is filed on record.
In view of the statement recorded herein-above, the appeal stands disposed of, as withdrawn.
JUDGE JUDGE Gulande