Bombay High CourtCAW/2258/2019ca disposed off

Mr. Chirag S/O Mahindrabhai Shah v. Sou. Vedika W/O Chirag Shah And Another

2019-10-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar2 pages

ca2258.19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.2258 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.174 OF 2019 Chirag s/o Mahendrabhai Shah.

Vs.

Sou. Vedika W/o Chirag Shah and another.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court'

s or Judge'

s orders appearances, Court'

s orders of directions and Registrar'

s orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri H. R. Gadhia, Advocate for applicant.

Shri R. S. Thengne, Advocate for respondents. CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR, J.

DATE : OCTOBER 04, .

By this application it is prayed that the petitioner be directed to deposit arrears of maintenance at the rate of Rs.5,000/- per month with regard to both the respondents from 01.06.2017 to 01.07.2019. It is stated that despite the interim order passed on 10.04.2019 the arrears of maintenance have not been deposited.

Reply has been filed on behalf of the petitioners in which it is stated that an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- has been paid to the respondents earlier and hence the amount of Rs.2,50,000/- be adjusted from that amount. It is further urged that the petitioner is unwell and is facing financial difficulties in complying with that order. The order dated 10.04.2019 was passed after hearing learned counsel for the parties. The order passed on 25.04.2018 by the Hon'

ble Supreme Court was also noted and hence the petitioner was directed to pay an

ca2258.19 amount of Rs.5,000/- per month to each respondent by reducing the amount of Rs.10,000/- per month as directed by the Court. The contentions now sought to be raised by the petitioner were considered when the aforesaid order was passed.

In that view of the matter the petitioner is finally granted time of six weeks to comply with the interim order dated 10.04.2019. If the said order is not complied within the period of six weeks the interim order shall stand vacated without reference to Court. Civil Application is disposed of.

JUDGE Sarkate