← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/6430/2022dismissed

Ganesh Vithobaji Dhabale v. Uttam S/O. Sadashiv Bhagat

2023-10-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor2 pages

2023:BHC-NAG:16094 75wp6430-22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Writ Petition No.6430 of 2022 GANESH VITHOBAJI DHABALE VS UTTAM S/O. SADASHIV BHAGAT Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order Shri P.S. Raut, Advocate for the Petitioner/s Shri M.V. Rai, Advocate for the Respondent-sole CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR, J.

DATED : 23.10.2023 1.

Heard.

2.

In the suit for recovery of possession of agricultural land, the petitioner/defendant moved an application for framing an additional issue and thereby, prayed the trial Court to frame the issue, whether the defendant/petitioner proves that he is a tenant of the suit field.

3.

It is the case of the petitioner that, he is in possession of the suit property as a tenant and the respondent has executed the Maktepatra on 12.07.2013 in respect of the suit property in favour of the petitioner.

4.

Thus, from the application, it can be said that the basis to frame an additional issue, is the document, namely Maktepatra and the learned trial Court, after going though the said document, has held that under the said Maktepatra, the land was nd.thawre

75wp6430-22.odt given to the petitioner for one year and the document does not create any tenancy in favour of the petitioner. 5.

Moreover, the learned trial Court has observed that the claim of the respondent/plaintiff is for possession of the land on the basis of title. Accordingly, the application was rejected. 6.

After going through the impugned order dated 10.08.2022 passed by the learned Civil Judge Junior Division, Dhamangaon Railway, I do not find any error committed by the trial Court. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.

[ANIL S. KILOR, J.] nd.thawre