Bombay High CourtWP/632/2019dismissed

Rohitas Harisingh Yadav v. Superintendent Central Jail Amravati

2019-09-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq,Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Pushpa V. Ganediwala1 pages

1 52.wp632.2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.632/2019 Rohitas Harisingh Yadav ..VS..

Superintendent Central Jail, Amravati & Anr.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court'

s or Judge'

s orders appearances, Court'

s orders of directions and Registrar'

s orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri D. L. Agrawal, Advocate (appointed) for the petitioner Ms N. R. Tripathi, APP for the respondent Nos. 1 & 2 CORAM : Z.A.HAQ AND PUSHPA V. GANEDIWALA, JJ.

DATED : 30 th September 2019 Learned Advocate for the petitioner states that after filling of this petition, the petitioner is released on parole leave and hence, grievance of the petitioner does not survive.

The petition is disposed as infructuous.

The fees of the learned Advocate appointed to represent the petitioner be paid as per rules. (PUSHPA V. GANEDIWALA, J.) (Z.A. HAQ, J.) Namrata