Bombay High CourtWP/4588/2014dispossed offdismiss for default

M/S Universal Dairies Private Ltd., Through Its Licensee Shri Vinod Tiwari v. Union Of India, Through Chairman Railway Board, New Delhi And Another

2016-08-31Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Kum. Justice Indira Jain3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3918/2014 M/s Balan Natural Food (P) Ltd., through its Authorised Representative, New Delhi - 110021 ...Versus...

Union of India, through Chairman Railway Board, New Delhi and another WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4588/2014 M/s Universal Dairies Private Ltd., through its Licensee Shri Vinod Tiwari, New Delhi ...Versus...

Union of India, through Chairman Railway Board, New Delhi and another - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri A.S. Kilor, Advocate for petitioner in both petitions Shri Nitin Lambat, Advocate for respondents in both petitions CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.

DATE : 31.08.2016 By these writ petitions, the petitioners have sought a direction against the respondent - Railways to consider the applications of the petitioners for renewal of their licence in terms of the Catering Policy, 2010.

Shri Lambat, the learned Counsel for the respondents states, by relying on the affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent

no.2, that the petitioners are not desirous of seeking the renewal and they have informed about the same, to the respondent - authorities.

Shri Kilor, the learned Counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the statement made by the learned Counsel for the respondents.

If the petitioners are not interested in seeking the renewal, the writ petitions would not survive. Hence, in view of the statements made on behalf of the parties, the writ petitions are disposed of with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE Wadkar

C E R T I F I C A T E I certify that this order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed order.

Uploaded by : S.S. Wadkar, P.S. Uploaded on : 01/09/2016