← Library
Bombay High CourtCAO/1907/2019dismissedrule discharged

Smt. Vandana Ramesh Dhande (Maiden Name Vandana Wasudeoraoji Dhoble) v. Ramesh S/O Damodhar Dhande And Another

2020-01-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.M. Modak1 pages

1 cao 1907.19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Civil Application (O) No.1907/2019 In Family Court Appeal St. No.15809/2019 Smt. Vandana Dhande V Ramesh Dhande and another - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court'

s or Judge'

s orders appearances, Court'

s orders of directions and Registrar'

s orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -------------- Shri Vibhas Tunkikar, Advocate h/f Shri S.D. Khati, Advocate for applicant/appellant.

CORAM : Z.A. HAQ & S.M. MODAK, JJ.

DATE : 09-01-2020.

The office note shows that the notices of respondent nos. 1 and 2 could not be served as the noticees are not residing on the address given in the Civil Application. On verification, it is found that the address of non-applicant no.2-Prabhakar Natthuji Lendhe is incomplete and not the same as was given before the Family Court on which he was served. For the callousness on the part of the applicant-appellant and applicant'

s Advocate, Civil Application is dismissed.

2.

The appellant-applicant/Advocate for the applicant-appellant shall deposit ₹ 1000/- with the High Court Legal Services Sub-Committee, Nagpur, and produce receipt of it on record of this appeal within two weeks.

3.

The applicant-appellant will be at liberty to file fresh application with proper address, if so advised. 4.

Keep the matter for further consideration/hearing on 03-02-2020.

JUDGE JUDGE Deshmukh