← Library
Bombay High CourtCAO/867/2022allowed

Mr. Mithun S/O Mohanrao Salunkhe v. Sau. Priyanka W/O Mithun Salunkhe

2022-12-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandeep Kashinath Shinde,Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. Joshi2 pages

8 CAO-867-2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CIVIL APPLICATION (O) NO.

8 67 OF 2022 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST.) NO.14362 OF 2022 [Mr. Mithun S/o Mohanrao Salunkhe ..V/s.. Sau. Priyanka W/o Mithun Salunkhe] ______________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders.

Ms A. Dangre, Adv. h/f Shri A. N. Answari, Advocate for the Applicant/Appellant. Ms S. S. Dhone, Adv. h/f Ms S. H. Bhatia, Advocate for the Respondent-sole.

CORAM

: SANDEEP K. SHINDE AND MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : 20 th DECEMBER , 202 2 .

.

This application seeks to condone the delay of 110 days caused in preferring an appeal against the judgment and order dated 13.04.2022, in Petition No.A-92 of 2021, passed by the Family Court, Buldana, inter alia dissolving the marriage between the parties.

2.

Heard learned Counsel appearing for the parties. Perused the averments in the civil application. In consideration of the averments made in the application, sufficient cause has been shown to condone the delay. Accordingly, the delay of 110 days is condoned. Application is allowed and disposed of.

FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST.) NO.14362 OF 2022 3.

Admit.

4.

Call Record and Proceedings from the Family Court, Buldana. CIVIL APPLICATION (O) NO.868 OF 2022 .

5.

Heard learned Counsel for the Appellant/Applicant. 6.

Learned Counsel for Respondent seeks time to file a reply.

8 CAO-867-2022 Time granted. Stand over to 24.01.2023.

7.

In the meanwhile, there shall be ad-interim relief, in terms of prayer Clause (i).

(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.) TAMBE ASHOKRAO TAMBE Personal Assistant to Hon'ble JUDGE