Sau. Nivedita W/O Pritamsing Jain v. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Nagpur Thr. Its Chief Regional Manager And Others

11.cp.293.18.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CONTEMPT PETITION NO.293/2018 I N WRIT PETITION NO.967/2015 Sau. Nivedita w/o. Pritamsingh Jain Vs.

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited and Ors. _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

Mr. Digvijay Khapre, Adv. h/f. Mr. R. L. Khapre, Sr.Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Akshay Naik, Advocate for Respondent No.3. CORAM :

AMIT BORKAR , J.

DATE :

th JUNE, 2022.

.

The learned Advocate for the petitioner states that, the petitioner is dead.

2.

But Mr. Naik, learned Advocate for the Respondent No.3 submits that the present petition alleges breach of order dated 20.10.2016 and modified by order dated 27.10.2016 are required the contemnor/respondent No.1 to pay an amount of Rs.2,22,000/- per month as occupation charges.

3.

The contemnor/respondent No.1 has filed an affidavit stating that it has complied with the said order. It has placed on record the copies of receipts to show deposit of amount with the Court. It has tendered chart. It is marked as 'Exhibit - X' for the purpose of identification. It has taken on record. Since the contemnor/respondent No.1 has complied with the direction nothing remains to be

11.cp.293.18.odt adjudicated in the present matter, the Contempt Petition, is therefore, disposed of.

JUDGE RGurnule.

MANOJ MANDADE 12:33