← Library
Bombay High CourtCAF/3578/2017dispossed offdismiss for default

Divisional Controller, Maharashtra State Road Tran. Corp. v. Smt. Malutai Wd/O Uttamrao Alone And ORS.

2017-11-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice P.N. Deshmukh2 pages

caf.3578.17.

1/2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION [CAF] NO.3578 OF 2017 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.957 OF 2007 (D) (Divisional Controller, M.S.R.T.C., Amravati vs.

Smt. Malutai wd/o Uttamrao Alone and others) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= OfÏce notes, OfÏce Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

CORAM

: P.N. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE : 23 rd NOVEMBER, 2017.

Heard Mrs. S.W. Deshpande, learned Counsel for applicant-respondent Nos.1 to 5. None for the appellant-State Transport Corporation though duly served.

This application is for grant of permission to withdraw entire amount of compensation as per judgment dated 31/01/2006 passed in Claim Petition No.251/2000 by learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Amravati.

Learned Counsel for applicants-respondents has submitted that against said award, appellantCorporation had preferred appeal, which was registered as First Appeal No.957/2007. During pendency of said appeal, as appellant failed to furnish paper-book in spite of granting sufÏcient time, appeal came to be dismissed on 18/06/2010 in view of conditional order passed by this Court about dismissal of appeal in the event no paper-book is filed within the stipulated time. It is submitted that in spite of

caf.3578.17.

2/2 dismissal of appeal as aforesaid, no steps are taken by the appellant-Corporation for restoration of the same.

It is further contended that the applicantsrespondents are the legal heirs and are dependents of deceased, who involved in an accident, being their father. From the application, it reveals that total amount of compensation to the extent of Rs.4,78,556/- is deposited by the appellant in this Court and respondents are earlier allowed to withdraw amount of Rs.1,78,556/- and balance amount of Rs.3,00,000/- is deposited with nationalized bank. Considering a fact of dismissal of appeal as aforesaid, applicants-respondents are thus found entitled for the amount deposited by the appellant. In the circumstances, application is allowed. Respondents are allowed to withdraw balance amount of Rs.3,00,000/- with interest accrued on said amount .

Civil application is disposed of as allowed in the above terms.

JUDGE *sdw