← Library
Bombay High CourtFA/1014/2015disposed off as a withdrawn

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Amravati v. Prashant Namdeorao Gaiki And Anothers

2024-11-30Lok - Adalat1 pages

1 11.caf.3690.2025

IN THE HIGH

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3690 OF 2025 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1014 OF 2015(D) MSRTC ..vs..

Prashant Namdeorao Gaiki and anr.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ms Shreya Bhagat, Advocate h/f Shri P.R. Agrawal, Advocate for the applicant.

CORAM: PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.

DATED :

10/10/2025.

Heard.

2.

In the present case, before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the injury claim was filed by the injured. The same was partly allowed. The appellant challenged the said judgment by way of present appeal.

3.

During the pendency of the present appeal, the original claimant Prashant Namdeorao Gaiki is expired on 05.10.2024. In view of this subsequent development, the present application is moved to add the father of the original claimant as one of the party respondent to the present proceeding.

4.

Hence, for the reason stated in the application, the application is allowed. The father of original claimant Namdeorao Gaiki be implead as a party respondent to the present appeal.

5.

Amendment be carried out forthwith.

6.

List the matter as per its turn.

Signed by: Trupti D. Agrawal Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 13/10/2025 10:26:16 (PRAVIN S. PATIL , J.

) Trupti