← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/2508/2022disposedoff

Kaduba Patilba Kakad (Dead) Thr. His Lrs. Nandaji Kaduba Kakad v. The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Its Secretary, Irrigation Dept., Mumbai And Another

2022-06-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar,Hon'Ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke2 pages

WP 2508-2022 Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

WRIT PETITION NO. 2508 OF 2022 Kaduba Patilba Kakad (dead), Through his Legal Heir Nandaji Kaduba Kakad, Aged about 40 years, R/o Gargundi, Tq. Deulgaon Raja, District - Buldana.

PETITIONER .....VERSUS.....

1.

The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Irrigation Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 400032.

2.

The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Khadakpurna Project, Sindkhed Raja, Tq. Sindkhed Raja, District - Buldana.

R ESPONDENT S Shri R.N. Ghuge, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. T.H. Udeshi, A.G.P. for the respondents/ State. CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR AND URMILA JOSHI - PHALKE, J J . D ATE : 24 th JUNE, 2022 .

ORAL

JUDGMENT

(PER : A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.) RULE. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

The learned Assistant Government Pleader waives notice for the respondents.

3.

The only prayer made in the Writ Petition is for a direction to be issued to respondent No.2 to decide the application preferred by the

WP 2508-2022 Judgment petitioner under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, which has been preferred on 28/08/2018.

4.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of by directing respondent No.2 to decide the aforesaid proceedings, if the same has not been disposed of, expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from receipt of the copy of this order. 5.

Rule is made absolute in the aforesaid terms. No costs. (URMILA JOSHI - PHALKE, J.) (A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.) SUMIT AGRAWAL