Jitendra S/O Madanchand Mohta v. State Of Mah.T Hr. Police Inspector (Crime) Ps Sitabuldi Nagpur And2 Others

2023:BHC-NAG:14009 1 cri.wp 563.2023.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

Criminal Writ Petition No.

of 20 [Jitendra S/o Madanchand Mohta ..vs.. State of Maharashtra, through P.I. (Crime), P.S. Sitabuldi, Nagpur and ors.] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. R. D. Bhuibhar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. A. R. Chutake, APP for respondent nos. 1 and 2 Mr. Vilas Dongre, Advocate for respondent no. 3 CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE J .

DATED : 25 - 9Having heard for some time, the learned counsel appearing for the parties submit that the purpose will be served if the Sessions Court is directed to decide Criminal Revision Application No. 182/2023 as expeditiously as possible, preferably within two months of filing reply by the petitioner, considering the fact that the dispute relates to the day to day operation of business activities of the parties involved in the dispute. The request being innocuous, following order is passed.

ORDER

(i) The petition is disposed of with the request to the learned Sessions Court, Nagpur to decide Criminal Revision Application No. 182/2023 as expeditiously as possible, preferably within two months from the date of filing reply by the petitioner herein.

(ii) The Sessions Court shall not get influence by the observations/remarks made in paragraph 4 of the impugned order dated 5-7-2023 for the reason that these observations have been made ex-parte.

2 cri.wp 563.2023.odt (iii) All contentions are kept open.

(iv) The interim order passed by the Sessions Court shall remain in operation till the parties appear before the Sessions Court.

(v) The parties to appear before the Sessions Court on the scheduled date of hearing.

(vi) The respondent no. 3 is at liberty to seek continuation of interim order before the Sessions Court. (Anil L. Pansare, J.) wasnik