← Library
Bombay High CourtMCA/1032/2014admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

Kavita W/O Rahul Dhoke v. Rahul S/O Mahadeo Dhoke

2015-09-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.P. Bhangale2 pages

mca1032.14 1/2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR MCA No. 1032 of 2014 Kavita v. Rahul =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Mr V. A. Brahme, Adv for applicant

CORAM

: A.P.BHANGALE, J.

DATE : 2.9.2015.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant. Respondent-husband has filed petition for divorce in the Court at Wardha. Applicant is living at Nagpur with her parents. She states that she is not keeping good health and her bad health would not permit her to attend the divorce proceedings at Wardha.

2.

Application is not opposed by filing reply. None appears for respondent. Since the contents of application have gone unchallenged, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause "a" thereof. No order as to costs. JUDGE joshi

mca1032.14 2/2