← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3763/2025disposed off

Gajesh Vasantrao Deshmukh v. Vidarbh Youth Welfare Society, Through Its President, Amravati And Others

2025-11-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. Vyas2 pages

2025:BHC-NAG:11668-DB 27.wp.3763.2025.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

WRIT PETITION NO. 3763 OF 2025 Gajesh Vasantrao Deshmukh .Vs.

Vidarbh Youth Welfare Society, through its President, Amravati and others _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

Mr P. A. Kadu, Advocate for the petitioner Mr R. D. Bhuibhar, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR AND RAJNISH R. VYAS, JJ. DATED : NOVEM BER 10 , 2025 .

The learned counsel for the respondents pointed out that in pursuance to the order dated 23.07.2025, the respondents filed an affidavit pointing out the reasons for the delay in completing the departmental inquiry against the petitioner and also the reasons for not paying subsistence allowance.

2.

Having gone through the affidavit we are of the opinion that no justifiable reason is provided for not paying the subsistence allowance to the petitioner. Furthermore, the learned counsel for the respondents make a statement that if the petitioner cooperate, within three months inquiry will be completed.

3.

We accept the statement of the respondents as regard the completion of the inquiry within three months

27.wp.3763.2025.odt alongwith the undertaking of the petitioner that he will cooperate inquiry officer to complete the inquiry within three months.

4.

As there is no justifiable reason provided, for not paying subsistence allowance to the petitioner, we direct the respondents to pay the subsistence allowance alongwith the arrears of subsistence of allowance in accordance with law within a period of two months from today and henceforth pay the subsistence allowance regularly till the completion of the inquiry.

5.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. [RAJNISH R. VYAS, J] [ANIL S. KILOR, J.] Namrata