Shankar Sakharam Bandane v. The Executive Engineer Bembla Project Division Yavatmal And Others

cao1332.18 18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO.1332/2018 IN MCA ST.NO.16398/2018 IN FA ST.NO.16906/2016 Shankar Sakharam Bandane ..vs..

The Exe. Engg. Bembla Project Division, Yavatmal, District Yavatmal and ors ............................................................................................................................................................................................. ......

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders ............................................................................................................................................................................................. ......

Shri A.B. Nakshane, Counsel for the applicant. Shri M.A. Kadu, Counsel for non-applicant No.1. Shri H.D. Dubey, AGP for non-applicant Nos.2 and 3.

CORAM

: MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, J.

DATED : JULY 30, 2018.

1.

This is an application for condonation of delay of 573 days caused in filing an application for revision against order dated 20.12.2016 passed by the Registrar of this Court.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3.

For the reasons stated therein, the application is allowed. Delay of 573 days caused in filing the application for revision against order dated 20.12.2016 passed by the Registrar of this Court is condoned. The civil application stands disposed of accordingly.

MCA ST.NO.16398/2018 1.

Heard.

2.

This is an application for revision against order dated 20.12.2016 passed by the Registrar of this Court. 3.

Being aggrieved by judgment and award passed by learned 2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division at Yavatmal in LAC NO.41/2010 decided .....2/-

cao1332.18 18 on 11.10.2011, the appeal is preferred by the applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant contended that the Registrar of this Court refused to register the first appeal on 20.12.2016 as due to inadvertence he was unable to mark the matter in the cause list and, therefore for want of non removal of the office objection the stamp was refused by the Registrar. Learned counsel for the applicant contended that within a period of one week from today he will remove the office objections.

4.

In that view of the matter, the Misc. Civil Application is allowed. Order dated 20.12.2016 passed by the Register of this Court is hereby set aside. The First Appeal Stamp is restored. The Misc. Civil Application stands disposed of accordingly.

JUDGE !! BRW !!

...../-