← Library
Bombay High CourtCAO/1049/2022allowed

Nitin Devendra Turaskar And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Secy., Dept. Of Rural Devpt. And Water Conservation, Mumbai And ORS

2023-07-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar,Hon'Ble Shri Justice G. A. Sanap1 pages

1 1-CAO-1049-2022.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (O) NO. 1049 OF 2022 IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) ST. NO. 14752 OF 2022 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 23 OF 2021 (Dr. Nitin Devendra Turaskar & Ors. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court'

s orders of directions Court' s or Judge'

s order and Registrar'

s orders.

Shri Uday Dastane, Advocate for the applicants/ petitioners. Shri S.A. Ashirgade, Assistant Government Pleader for non-applicant nos. 1 to 6. Shri N.B. Kalwaghe, Advocate for non-applicant nos. 7 and 8. Shri A.Y. Kapgate, Advocate for non-applicant no.9. Shri M.G. Bhangde, Senior Advocate with Shri S.S. Sarda, Advocate for nonapplicant no.10. CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR AND G.A. SANAP , JJ.

ATE : JULY 21 , 2023 Though the prayer for condoning the delay is opposed by the learned Counsel for non-applicant no.9, we find that the reasons stated in the application are sufficient to condone the delay.

2] The delay is accordingly condoned. The Civil Application is allowed and disposed of.

MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) ST. NO. 14752/2022 3] The learned Counsel for the non-applicants are granted time to file their affidavit-in-replies. Civil Application (O) No. 950/2023 shall be considered along with the review application.

4] Stand over to 4/8/2023.

(JUDGE) (JUDGE) SUMIT