Sau. Bhawna W/O Gajendra Bopche v. State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Department Of Woman And Child Development, Mumbai And ANR

2023:BHC-NAG:13674-DB 1 12-WP-6153-2023.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 6153 OF 2023 (Sau. Bhawna w/o Gajendra Bopche Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr.) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court'

s orders of directions Court' s or Judge'

s order and Registrar'

s orders.

Shri S.S. Tambulkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri A.S. Fulzele, Additional Government Pleader for the respondents. CORAM : A. S. CHANDURKAR AND MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI , JJ.

ATE : SEPTEMBER 13 , 2023 Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2] It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that merit list while making recruitment to the post of Anganwadi Madatnis for Tahsil - Bangaon has been prepared in a composite manner notwithstanding the fact that the recruitment was to be made at three different places. Insofar as Village - Bangaon, Tahsil - Amgaon is concerned, the petitioner is a resident of that Village and she has secured highest marks of candidates coming from the said Village.

3] It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that pursuant to the publication of the aforesaid list, an objection in terms thereof has been raised before respondent no.2. Though the said objection is dated 7/8/2023, the same has not yet been decided.

4] In these facts, the following order would serve the interest of justice :

ORDER

Respondent no.2 shall consider the petitioner's objection dated 7/8/2023 and after hearing the petitioner take a decision within a period of two weeks of receiving copy of this order.

5] Needless to state that if the petitioner has any further grievance, she is free to take such steps as are permissible in law. 6] Rule is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. No costs. (MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (A. S. CHANDURKAR, J.) SUMIT