Sau. Anita Dhananjayrao Pathak v. Sarvottam Tukaram Bhanegaonkar (Dead) Thr. Lrs. Sau. Sangeeta W/O Milind Purankar And Others

SA135-16 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR SECOND APPEAL NO. 135/2016 (ANITA DHANANJAYRAO PATHAK VERSUS SARVOTTAM TUKARAM BHANEGAONKAR & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - None for the appellant.

Shri G.M. Kubde, counsel for the R-1.

CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.

DATE : SEPTEMBER 11 , 2018.

On 13.08.2018, at the request of counsel for the appellant, the matter was adjourned to 03.09.2018 by way of last chance. On 03.09.2018, it was again adjourned at the request of the appellant. On 10.09.2018, as there was no appearance on behalf of the appellant, the appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution. It was subsequently prayed that the appeal be restored and that it would be argued today. It was thus restored. Today, there is no appearance on behalf of the appellant. Appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. If any application for restoration is moved, same shall be accepted after costs of Rupees One Thousand are paid to the High Court Legal Services Sub Committee, Nagpur.

JUDGE APTE Rohit Dattatraya Apte Rohit Dattatraya Apte Date: 2018.09.12 11:32:47 +0530