Pramod Dagduji Solanki v. The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Dept. Of Revenue And Forest, Mumbai And Others

2023:BHC-NAG:13045-DB 1 18.wp.5724.23.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.

5724/2023 Pramod Dagduji Solanki Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order or directions and Registrar's orders ................................................................................................................................................... Mr. N. D. Futane, Advocate for Petitioner.

Mr. A. A. Madiwale, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondents. CORAM :

A.S.CHANDURKAR AND MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI,JJ.. DATED :

01.09.2023 P. C.

.

Notice made returnable forthwith.

2.

The learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice for respondents.

3.

The petitioner seeks implementation of the order passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal in Original Application No.947/2018 (Shri Pramod Dagduji Solanke Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.). By the said order the petitioner was granted a deemed date of promotion as 28.09.2015 with regard to the post of Circle Officer. The seniority list was directed to be corrected and other benefits to be paid within a period of 90 days from the date of the order. Since this order was not complied with, the petitioner filed the Contempt Petition No.62/2022 before the Tribunal. The said proceedings came to be withdrawn on 16.09.2022 by stating that the petitioner's grievance was redressed.

4.

It is submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that the order passed by the Tribunal in the

2 18.wp.5724.23.odt Original Application has still not been implemented. He invites our attention to the communication dated 31.05.2023 issued by the Resident Deputy Collector to the petitioner. 5.

Since it is submitted by the learned Counsel for the petitioner that the order passed by the Tribunal in Original Application No.947/2018 is still not complied with, the petitioner is permitted to seek restoration and revival of the proceedings in Contempt Petition No.62/2022. If the petitioner moves such application, the Tribunal shall consider the same in accordance with law.

6.

With these directions, the writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.

(MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (A.S.CHANDURKAR, J.) RGurnule