Bombay High CourtCAW/2195/2019dismissedrule discharged

Vaishali Mahadeo Tabutwale v. Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Hospital And Research Centre, Through Dean

2019-08-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

1 wp5520.19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.5520 OF 2019 (VAISHALI MAHADEO TABUTWALE....VS..DR. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR HOSPITAL, NAGPUR.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.P.Kshirsagar, Advocate for Petitioner. CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.

DATED : AUGUST 09, 2019.

Heard.

Issue notice to the respondent, returnable on 4th October 2019.

CIVIL APPLN.NO.2195/2019.

If the contention of the petitioner that the respondent-institution is under the control of the State of Maharashtra, is correct, then the liability of paying salary/ wages of the petitioner would be of the State of Maharashtra. Prima-facie it appears that the State of Maharashtra would be necessary party, however, it is not impleaded and at the time of argument also it is not pointed out why the State of Maharashtra is not impleaded as party.

In these facts, the prayer for interim relief cannot be considered at this stage. Hence, the application is dismissed. No costs.

JUDGE RRaut..