Mr. Nirbhay Sudesh Khedikar v. Directorate Of Vocational Education And Training Through Deputy Director, Nagpur And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.

Writ Petition No.4879/2016 (Nirbhay Sudesh Khedikar .vs. Directorate of Vocational Education and Training and another ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's orders Mr. Kartik Patel, Advocate for Petitioner Mr. Nikhil Joshi, AGP for Respondent No.1.

CORAM : B.R. Gavai & V.M. Deshpande, JJ.

DATED : August 24, 2016.

The petition challenges the cancellation of the admission of the petitioner for ITI in Government Industrial Training Institute.

When the matter was called out in the morning, taking into consideration the importance of the student's career, we had requested the learned AGP to ask the concerned authority to remain present in the Court in the post lunch session.

In the afternoon, Mr. S.R. Suryawanshi, Joint Director of Vocational Education and Training, is personally present in the Court along with the record. We have perused the record. The recored reveals that there were complaints regarding various irregularities in the admissions. Accordingly respondent no.1 had constituted a Committee consisting of the Assistant Director, the District Vocational Education and Training Officer, Nagpur and the Inspector of the Regional Office, Nagpur to conduct an enquiry into the admissions conducted by respondent no.2. The enquiry was

accordingly conducted and it was found that there were various irregularities in the admission process conducted on 16.8.2016.

We have perused the original enquiry report.

The perusal of the enquiry report would reveal that though around 4000 students were present for admission, only names of 281 students were registered. It was found that the admission process conducted had deprived various meritorious students who were present but who were not registered for getting admission on the basis of their merit.

In that view of the matter, no error could be found with the decision of respondent no.1 to conduct the admission process afresh. The petition is found to be without merit and as such dismissed.

Needless to state that if the petitioner otherwise finds himself in the merit list prepared by the respondents, he would be entitled to admission. JUDGE JUDGE halwai

Certificate I certify that this order uploaded is a true and correct copy of original signed order.

Uploaded by : R.G. Halwai.

Uploaded on: 25.8.2016