← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/5666/2019disposed off

Gat Gram Panchayat, Dhaparla (Doye) Thr. Sarpanch Shri Patruji Mahadeo Tajne And Another v. Shri Vithal Mandir Deosthan, Through Trustees Ramdas Mahadeo Mungale And Others

2022-08-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice Avinash G. Gharote2 pages

(1) 29.wp.5666.2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.5666 OF 2019 Gat Gram Panchayat, Dhaparla (Doye) through its (A) Sarpanch, Shri Patruji Mahadeo Tajne and another Vs.

Vithal Mandir Deosthan, through its Trustees (A) Ramdas s/o Mahadeo Mungale and others --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. N. N. Thengre, Advocate for petitioners.

Mr. V. N. Morande, Advocate for respondent nos.1 to 3. CORAM :

AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.

DATE : 02/08/2022 1.

In pursuance to the order dated 16.12.2021, the Taluka Inspector of Land Records (T.I.L.R.) has measured the lands in question and has submitted a report to this Court.

2.

The petition questions the order dated 16.3.2019, passed by the learned trial Court granting the application at Exh.5 filed by the plaintiff, who are respondent in this petition. The appeal carried by the defendants before the Appellate Court in Misc. Civil Appeal No.86 of 2019 came to be dismissed by judgment dated 30.4.2019. Both the Courts below concurrently hold that the defendants are not entitled to carry on any construction on the land bearing Survey No.2 admeasuring 1.20 H.R. mouza Dhaparla(Doye). At the instance of the petitioner (original defendant) this Court

(2) 29.wp.5666.2019 by the order dated 16.12.2021 had directed a joint measurement of the land bearing Survey Nos.1 and 2 by the T.I.L.R., which report has been submitted which also supports the contention of the plaintiff that the construction work is being carried out on the land bearing Survey No.2, in view of which, there is no reason for me, to interfere in the impugned order and judgment. 3.

This is more so, when the claim of the petitioner, for entitlement of land bearing Survey No.2, is based upon a plea that the open land admeasuring 112 X 80 = 8960 sq. ft. was transferred in the year 2013-14 by one Devidas Dattatraya Thakare, however, there is no document of transfer as required by law.

4.

I therefore, do not see any reason to interfere with the concurrent findings rendered by the Courts below. It would be appropriate for petitioner, considering the nature of the controversy to get the suit decided on merits. The petitioner, shall be entitled to place the certified copy of the joint measurement report as submitted by the T.I.L.R. before the learned trial Court and so also its objections, which shall be duly considered by the learned trial Court as per law.

5.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

JUDGE Sarkate SARKATE 18:15