← Library
Bombay High CourtCAF/2612/2024allowed

Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, Through Its Chief Executive Officer, Amravati v. Shri Sheshrao Baliram Mehere (Dead), Thr. L.Rs. Smt. Pramilabai Wd/O Sheshrao Mehere And 9 Others

2025-09-26Hon'Ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke2 pages

2025:BHC-NAG:9936

(1) 1.caf.2612.2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO.2612 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.621 OF 2013 (D) Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation through its Chief Executive Officer Vs.

Shri Sheshrao Baliram Mehere (Dead) through LRs. 1. Smt. Pramilabai wd/o Sheshrao Mehere and others -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Shardul Polke, Counsel h/f Mr. M. M. Agnohotri, Counsel for the appellant.

Mr. C. A. Babrekar, Counsel for the applicants/respondent Nos.1 to 8. Mr. H. S. Dhande, AGP for respondent No.9 and 10 CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.

DATED : 26/09/2025 1.

By this application, the applicants / respondent Nos.1 to 8, seeks correction in the name of respondent Nos.2 to 6 in appeal memo as well as in record of the Court as per their Aadhar Cards and affidavit.

2.

Heard learned Counsel for the applicants/respondent Nos.1 to 8, who submitted that the surname of the respondent Nos.2 to 6 are not matching with the Aadhar Cards, therefore, to satisfy the registry, the respondent Nos.2 to 6 have filed affidavit on oath in respect of change of name. Registry has not satisfied with the same and therefore, the affidavit was sworn before the

(2) 1.caf.2612.2024 Tahsildar. Now, it is verified by the Registrar (Judicial).

3.

The learned AGP submitted that the appropriate orders be passed.

4.

Perused the application and the documents which are filed along with the application as well as the verification report of the Registrar. In view of that, the application is allowed.

5.

The applicant is directed to correct the name of respondents Nos.2 to 6 in appeal memo as well as in record, within two weeks.

The application is disposed of.

(URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.) Sarkate