← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/4966/2024dismissed

Sarfaraz Amin Godil v. Municipal Council, Gondia, Thr. Chief Executive Officer And ORS

2024-08-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri2 pages

2024:BHC-NAG:9527-DB 19-WP-4966-2024.odt 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.

WRIT PETITION NO. 4966 of 2024 Sarfaraz Amin Godil vs.

Municipal Council, Gondia and others.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court'

s or Judge'

s Order Coram, appearances, Court'

s Orders or directions and Registrar'

s order ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. Rohit Joshi, Advocate for petitioner.

Mr. M. I. Dhatrak, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mr. A. M. Kadukar, AGP for respondent nos. 2 and 3. CORAM :- NITIN W. SAMBRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE :- 26th AUGUST, 2024.

P. C. :

We have heard Mr. Joshi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner for sometime.

2.

Challenge in the petition is based on impermissibility of clubbing of various works in the matter of execution of Cement Concrete Road Project.

3.

Mr. Dhatrak, learned counsel for the respondent no.1-Municipal Council, has invited our attention to the order of this Court dated 19.08.2024 passed in Writ Petition NO. 4795 of 2024 (M/s. Krushna Buildcon, Gondia vs. Municipal Council, Gondia and anr.) by stating that the issue sought to be canvassed in this writ petition is already looked into and decided on 19.08.2024 in M/s. Krushna Buildcon (supra).

4.

We have perused the order dated 19.08.2024 in Writ Petition No. 4795 of 2024 in the background of the challenge raised in the petition.

5.

We are of the view that the issue raised in this petition is already looked into and appreciated by this Court in M/s. Krushna

19-WP-4966-2024.odt 2 Buildcon (in Writ Petition No.4795 of 2024 ) (supra). 6.

That being so, we see no reason to cause interference. The writ petition stands dismissed. No costs.

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) Andurkar.