← Library
Bombay High CourtCAO/1695/2015dismissedrule discharged

Maharashtra State Electricity Board, Through Its Chairman/Secretary, Mumbai And Others v. Sanjay Chandulal Kondane.

2015-10-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq2 pages

1 cao1695.15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO.1695 OF 2015 IN M.C.A. NO. 1062 of 2014 (D) IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1089 OF 2006 Maharashtra State Electricity Board, through its Chairman/Secretary, Mumbai and others ..V/s..

Sanjay Chandulal Kondane - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.

DATED : 01.10.2015.

Heard Shri R.E. Moharir, learned advocate for the applicants/petitioners and Shri C.H. Sharma, learned advocate for the non-applicant/respondent.

The Writ Petition No. 1089 of 2006 is decided by the judgment dated 2nd August, 2014.

The applicants/petitioners filed Misc. Civil Application No.1062 of 2014 seeking review of the above mentioned judgment passed by this Court. The Misc. Civil Application No. 1062 of 2014 is dismissed on 1st September, 2015. The applicants/ petitioners have filed this application praying that the order passed by this Court on Miscellaneous Civil Application No.1062 of 2014 on 1st September, 2015 be recalled. The contention of the applicants/ petitioners is that certain issues which are dealt with by this Court in the judgment given in Writ Petition No.1089 of 2006 were not raised by either of the parties. 0-

2 cao1695.15 In terms, this is the second review application and it is not permissible for this Court to entertain the second review application. Hence, without delving into the contentions raised by the applicants/petitioners in this application, the application is dismissed. In the circumstances, the parties to bear their own costs. JUDGE RRaut..