← Library
Bombay High CourtCP/317/2016dispossed offdismiss for default

Ku. Geeta D/O Digambar Tidke v. Dr. Madhavi Khode Additional Commissioner Tribal Development Dept., Nagpur

2016-10-20Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Kum. Justice Indira Jain2 pages

2010cp317.16.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.317/2016 IN CIVIL APPLICATION W. NO.2429/2015 (D) IN WRIT PETITION NO.541/2015 (P) Ku. Geeta d/o Digambar Tidke ...Versus...

Dr. Madhavi Khode, Additional Commissioner, Tribal Development Department, Nagpur - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri P.N. Shende, Advocate for petitioner Shri P.S. Tembhare, AGP for respondent CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.

DATE : 20.10.2016 By this contempt petition, the petitioner has sought action against the respondent for wilful disobedience of the directions in the order dated 22.1.2016.

According to the petitioner, though the respondent was directed to pay the arrears of salary to the petitioner within two months, and continue to pay the regular salary to the petitioner every month, the order was not complied with. Shri Tembhare, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent states that the order could not be complied within the stipulated time for the reasons stated in the affidavit-in-reply, dated 19.10.2016. It is stated that the order stands complied with and the arrears of salary are paid to the petitioner on 19.10.2016.

2010cp317.16.odt In view of the statements recorded herein above, we do not find that there is any reason to proceed with the contempt petition any longer. Hence, we dispose of the contempt petition with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE Wadkar