← Library
Bombay High CourtCAF/3716/2024ca disposed off

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Mumbai Thr. Its Divisional Controller, Yavatmal v. Kokila Prakash Panzade And Others

2025-06-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri3 pages

1 35 1781-2025.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO. 1781 OF 2025 IN CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO. 3716 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 16180 OF 2024 Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, Mumbai, through its Divisional Controller, Yavatmal Vs.

Kokila Prakash Panzade and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri V.H. Kedar, Advocate for the appellant Shri R.D. Karode, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 4 CORAM : SHRI ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.

DATED : 30.06.2025.

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO. 1781 OF 2025.

Applicant/appellant has moved the application to delete the name of respondent No.5 from the array of the respondents, as during the pendency of the appeal, he reported to be dead. He was a minor. His legal representatives are already on record. Accordingly, the application is allowed as prayed.

Appellant is directed to delete the name of the respondent No.5 from the array of the respondents within a week and supply a copy of the

2 35 1781-2025.odt amended appeal memo to the other side.

3.

Application stands disposed of.

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO. 3716 OF 2024 Applicant/appellant has filed an application to condone the delay of 234 days caused in filing the appeal, for which, learned Counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 to 4 has no objection to condone the delay. Though respondent No.7 is served, none appear for him.

3.

Considering the reason disclosed in the application, as well as no objection of the learned Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 4, the application is allowed as prayed. As such, the delay is condoned. 4.

Appeal be registered accordingly.

5.

Application stands disposed of.

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO. 1782 OF 2025 Applicants/respondents No. 1 to 4 have filed this application to permit them to withdraw the amount, for which learned Counsel for the appellant has given no objection to permit them to withdraw the amount as per the award passed by the Tribunal on the usual undertaking.

3 35 1781-2025.odt Considering the reason stated in the application as well as no objection of the learned Counsel for the appellant, the applicants are permitted to withdraw the amount as per the award of the Tribunal, on the usual undertaking.

3.

The Registrar (Judicial) is directed to transfer the amount of compensation into the bank accounts of respondent Nos. 1 to 4, respectively, as per the award passed by the Tribunal, in proportionate amounts, within four weeks, upon their furnishing the bank account details to the Registry.

4.

Application stands disposed of.

FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 16180 OF 2024 Heard.

Issue notice to the respondents, returnable after five weeks.

3.

Learned Counsel Shri R.D. Karode waives notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 4.

4.

Call for record and proceedings.

5.

List the matter on 15/07/2025.

JUDGE Jayashree....