Chitranshi D/O Mukesh Shastri v. State Of Maha., Thr. Commissioner And Competent Auth., State Common Entrance Test Cell And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.6048/2022 Chitranshi d/o Mukesh Shastri, aged about 24 years, Occ. Student, r/o flat no. 301, Plot No. 48, Nitai Apts, New Prerna Nagar, Mahlgi Nagar Chowk, Opp. Besa Power Plant, Nagpur-34.

.....PETITIONER ...V E R S U S...

1. State of Maharashtra through Commissioner and Competent Authority State Common Entrance Test Cell, 8th Floor, New Excelsior Building, AK Nayak Marg, Fort, Mumbai-400001

2. Admission Regulating Authority, through its Chairman, 9th Floor New Excelsior Building, AK Nayak Marg, Fort, Mumbai-400001

3. Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University, Nagpur through its Registrar, Nagpur, Tq. Dist. Nagpur.

4. Board of Examination and Evaluation through its Director RTMNU, Examination and Evaluation Building, LIT Premises, Amravati Road, Nagpur.

5. Bar. S. K. Wankhede College of Education, College of Teacher Education, (CTE), through its Principal, Law College Campus, Amravati Road, Nagpur-10 ...RESPONDENT S ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. P. S. Tiwari, Advocate for petitioner.

Mr. N. S. Khubalkar, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2. Mr. J. J. Chandurkar, Advocate for respondent nos. 3 and 4. Mr. R. D. Bhuibhar, Advocate for respondent No.5. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CORAM:- SUNIL B. SHUKRE & ANIL L. PANSARE, J J.

DATED :- 20.10.2022 ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: Sunil B. Shukre, J.) Heard. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of learned counsel for the parties. 2.

Communication dated 14.10.2022, sent by respondent no.2 to the college of the petitioner is taken on record and marked "A" for identification. It shows that the provisional approval to the admission of the petitioner to B.Ed course has been granted and final decision in that regard would be taken in the next meeting of the respondent no.2.

3.

With such a decision having been taken, we find that the grievance of the petitioner has been substantially redressed and, therefore, this petition deserves to be disposed of accordingly. 4.

We, therefore, dispose of the petition in terms of the communication, which is marked "A" and direct the respondent no.5, to issue Transfer Certificate to the petitioner, subject to the final decision to be taken by the respondent no.2 in the matter. We also direct the respondent nos.3 and 4 to declare the result of the examination of the third and the fourth semester courses and

supply copies of the mark-sheets to the petitioner, subject to the final decision taken by the respondent no.2 in the matter. Rule is made absolute in the above terms. No order as to costs.

(Anil L. Pansare, J.) (Sunil B. Shukre, J.) kahale ARVIND KAHALE 19:26