Tejram S/O Maruti Panchabhai v. Shri C.R. Borkar The Edun. Officer, Zp, Bhandara And Others.

can116.13

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAN) NO.116 OF 2013 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO.02 OF 2013 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3631 OF 2000 Tejram Panchbhai ..vs..

Shri C.R. Borker, Divisional Chairman, Maharashtra State Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Board, Nagpur and ors .......................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders ........................................................................................................................................... Shri A.H. Jamal, Counsel for the Applicant/Petitioner. Shri K.V. Deshmukh, Counsel for R-2 & 5.

CORAM

: B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & A.P.BHANGALE, JJ.

DATE : FEBRUARY 20, 2015.

Heard.

Prayer is to permit to bring certain events on record. New office bearers are also sought to be added as parties.

Shri K.V. Deshmukh, learned counsel for the original respondents, submits that there is no case for proceeding in contempt jurisdiction against newly elected persons. He further submits that amendment in effect brings on record cause which is stale. We keep all his .....2/-

can116.13 objections open. Subject to his objection, we allow the amendment.

Necessary amendment be carried out within one week.

List matter thereafter for finding out whether notice needs to be issued to the newly added parties.

JUDGE JUDGE !! BRW !!

...../-