← Library
Bombay High CourtMCA/736/2017admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

Sau. Mankarana W/O Gangaram Shinde v. Gagaram S/O Maroti Shinde And Others

2017-07-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar1 pages

CA1734.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Civil Application No. 1734/2015 in MCA St. No. 18323/2015 in Second Appeal No. 18538/2011 Sau. Mankarna W/o Gangaram Shinde V/s Gangaram s/o Maroti Shinde and another - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri. D.S. Patil, Advocate for appellant.

Shri Vivek Awachat, Advocate for Respondent No. 1. CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR, J DATED : 17 th JULY, 2017.

By this application, it is prayed that the delay in filing application for restoration of the second appeal be condoned. The reasons for delay are mentioned in paras 4 to 7 of the application. The application is opposed by the respondent no. 1 by filing reply.

Considering reasons mentioned in the application which appear to be acceptable, the delay stands condoned. Civil application is allowed and disposed of. M.C.A. St. No. 18323/2015 Though the prayer made in the application is opposed by the learned counsel for the respondent No.1, the same is allowed and second appeal is restored to file.

Objections if any be removed within period of three weeks. Misc. Civil Application is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

Nandurkar JUDGE