← Library
Bombay High CourtCAO/1549/2019ca disposed off

Gram Udapur Punarvasan Sangharsh Samiti, Thr. President Satish P. Bhoyar And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra, Through Secretary, Irrigation And Revenue, Mumbai And Others

2021-07-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil B. Shukre,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor2 pages

1 PIL26.19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO.1161 OF 2019 AND CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO.1547 OF 2019 AND CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO.1549 OF 2019 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.26 OF 2019 (GRAM UDAPUR PUNARVASAN SANGHARSH SAMITI & OTH...VS..STATE OF MAH. IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court'

s or Judge'

s orders appearances, Court'

s orders of directions and Registrar'

s orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri C.S.Kaptan, Sr. Advocate a/b. Shri N.S.Khandewale, Advocate for Petitioners.

Ms N.P.Mehta, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1, 3 to 5. Shri S.S.Godbole, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2, 6 and 7. Shri J.M.Gandhi, Advocate for Interveners-applicants.(cao1547 & 1549) CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.

DATED : JULY 14, 2021.

Hearing is conducted through Video Conferencing and all the learned Advocates agreed that the audio and video quality was proper.

CIVIL APPLN.NO.1161/2019.

1.

Heard.

2.

For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed.

3.

Additional documents, annexed along with this application, are directed to be taken on record.

2 PIL26.19 4.

The application stands disposed of accordingly. CIVIL APPLN.NOS. 1547/2019 & 1549/2019.

1.

Heard.

2.

By these applications, the applicants have sought leave of this Court for their being impleaded as interveners/ respondents. We see no difficulty in granting these applications as both the applicants are undisputedly Project Affected Persons and the cause which is being taken up to this Public Interest Litigation is on behalf of the Project Affected Persons. Both the applications are, therefore, allowed. The interveners-applicants be joined in the array of respondents and be heard as interveners-applicants.

4.

Necessary amendment to the cause title be carried out on or before the next date.

5.

Copy of the petition, along with all the annexures to it, be supplied to the interveners-applicants. 6.

Both the applications stand disposed of accordingly.

6.

List the matter for further consideration/hearing after two weeks.

(ANIL S.KILOR,J) (SUNIL B. SHUKRE,J) RRaut..