The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Tds Aykar Bhavan Nagpur v. The Project Director National Highways Auth. Of India Ltd., Amravati
1 902.ITA33.07.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.33/2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV Vs. Ballarpur Industries Ltd. WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.89/2009 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.41/2009 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.42/2009 The Commissioner of Income Tax-III Vs. Puranlal Agrawal (Dead),Through LR's. WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.43/2015 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur-1. Vs. Pushpendrakumar K. Sharma. WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.83/2015 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur-1. Vs. M/s. Rachana Construction Co., Nagpur.
WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.7/2016 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.11/2016 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.13/2016 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-3, Nagpur. Vs.
M/s. Bharat Hardware & Iron Stores, Nagpur.
WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.21/2016 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur-I, Nagpur. Vs.
M/s. Leela Ventures India Pvt. Ltd. Nagpur.
WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.75/2016 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.78/2016 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.79/2016 The Commissioner of Income Tax-TDS, Nagpur.
Vs.
The Project Director, National Highways Authority of India Ltd, Amravati. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.99/2017 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur-3. Vs. Khalid Nadeem Allarakha.
2 902.ITA33.07.odt ........................................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders .............................................................................................................................................. I n all Income Tax Appeals.
Shri Anand Parchure, Advocate for the Appellant. In ITA No. 33/07, 89/09, 41/09, 42/09, 83/15, 7/16, 11/16, 13/16. Shri K. P. Dewani, Advocate for respondent.
In ITA No.43/15.
Shri Rohit Thakar h/f Shri S.C.Thakar, Advocate for respondent. In ITA No.75/16, 78/16, 79/16.
Shri Ankit Kathane, Advocate for respondent.
CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.
DATED :
13th DECEMBER, 2019.
.
The Commissioner of Income Tax has filed pursis in all these matters seeking permission to withdraw the Appeals and for refund of court fees as per the law. The respondent has no objection. Hence, all these Appeals are permitted to be withdrawn and Office is directed to refund the court fee, if permissible in accordance with law.
JUDGE JUDGE RGurnule