Sudarshan S/O Krishnarao Golhar v. The Collector, Yavatmal And 3 Others

1 wp5003.14.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.5003 OF 2014 [Sudarshan s/o Krishnarao Golhar .vs. The Collector, Yavatmal and others] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri P.R. Agrawal, counsel for the petitioner, Shri D.P. Thakre, AGP for respondent no.1, Shri R.J. Mirza, counsel for respondent nos.2 and 3. ..........

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.M. BADAR, JJ.

DATED : APRIL 07, 2015.

Shri Thakre, the learned Assistant Government Pleader raises a preliminary objection to the tenability of the writ petition on the ground that the petitioner has an alternate efficacious remedy of filing original application before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal for seeking the relief sought by the instant petition. By upholding the preliminary objection raised on behalf of the respondent, we dispose of the writ petition with no order as to costs. The points raised in the petition are kept open. Since ad-interim relief is operating in favour of the petitioner from 17.9.2014, we continue the ad-interim relief only for a period of two weeks. Order accordingly.

JUDGE JUDGE Gulande