← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/5575/2023dismissed

Sau. Nalini W/O Ravindra Dhanorkar And Others v. Joint District Registrar Class - I, Wardha And Collector Of Stamps, Wardha And Another

2024-01-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice Avinash G. Gharote,Hon'Ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar2 pages

2024:BHC-NAG:38-DB

3. WP 5575 of 2023.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.5575/2023 Sau. Nalini w/o Ravindra Dhanorkar and others ...Versus...

Joint District Registrar Class-1, Wardha and Collector of Stamps, Wardha and another - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ - Mr. S.S. Shingane, Advocate for petitioners Ms Tajwar Khan, AGP for respondent no.1 CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE AND SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, JJ.

DATE : 02/01/2024 1.

Heard Mr. Shingane, learned counsel for the petitioners.

2.

In view of a matrimonial dispute pending between the petitioner no.1 and the respondent no.2, the objection raised by the petitioner no.1 to the request for voluntary retirement put in by the respondent no.2 has not been considered, is the grievance raised in the present petition. 3.

In our considered opinion, pendency of a matrimonial dispute between an employee and his spouse cannot be a ground to be considered for accepting the request for voluntary retirement. This is more so, when domestic

3. WP 5575 of 2023.odt violence proceedings, at the behest of the petitioner no.1 against the respondent no.2, are already pending in an appropriate Court, in which application for maintenance filed by the petitioner no.1, is also under consideration. 4.

We, therefore, do not see any reason to accept the petition. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed. No order as to costs.

(SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.) Wadkar