Krantikumar S/O. Ramesh Pande v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. Police Station Ghatanji Dist. Yavatmal

28.08.appa.650.17

IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO. 650/2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 383/2017 (Krantikumar s/o Ramesh Pande vs. The State of Maharashtra ) ...................................................... ............................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders .............................................................................................................................................. Mr. C.R.Thakur, Advocate for the applicant Mr. S.B.Bissa, APP for respondent CORAM : MRS.SWAPNA JOSHI, J.

D ATED : 28th August, 2017.

By this Application, the applicant prays for suspension of jail sentence imposed upon him by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal dated 29th July, 2017 in Sessions Trial No. 106/2011.

The applicant was convicted for the offence punishable under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer R.I. for two years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5000/- in default, to suffer RI for three months. I have heard the counsel for the respective parties.

The applicant was on bail during the pendency of trial. Even after the judgment and order of conviction, the learned trial court has suspended the jail sentence and the applicant was released on bail.

In view of the above facts, considering the nature of offence and the fact that it would not be possible to take up the hearing of

28.08.appa.650.17 the appeal finally by this Court in the near future, due to pendency of old matters, the applicant is entitled to suspension of jail sentence and grant of bail. Hence the following order: ORDER:

1) Criminal Application No. 650/2017 is allowed. 2) The substantive jail sentence imposed against the applicant by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal in Sessions Trial No. 106/2011 dated 29.07.2017 shall remain suspended during the pendency of the present Appeal.

3) The applicant shall be released on bail by executing fresh bonds of the same amount as in the trial court. 4) The learned Judge before whom the bail bonds will be executed shall ensure that before execution of the bail bonds, the entire fine amount is deposited by the applicant. 5) The applicant shall remain personally present before this court at the time of final hearing of the Appeal. The Application stands disposed of.

JUDGE Sahare