Shri Sonba S/O Gulabrao Musale v. Shri Sunil S/O Chhatrapal Kedar And 2 Others

IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (O)NO.1563/2016 IN ELECTION PETITION NO. 3/2014 (Shri Sonba Gulabrao Musale vs. Shri Sunil s/o Chhatrapal Kedar and others ) .............................................................................................................................................. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders .............................................................................................................................................. CORAM : V.M. DESHPANDE, J.

DATED : 2nd September, 2016 Heard Shri Anil Kilor, the learned counsel for the election petitioner; Shri A.A. Naik, the learned counsel for the respondent no.1 and Smt. Rucha Pande, h/for Shri S.S.Ghate, learned counsel for the respondent no.3.

An Application (Exh.20) was moved by the election petitioner on 19.8.2016. By the said Application, the petitioner sought to file a document on record. The said document is a deed of reconstruction of partnership change in constitution. The learned counsel for the respondent no.1 placed a reply to the said Application today. The same is taken on record and marked as Exh.23. By the reply, the Application is opposed.

With the consent of the parties, the Application (Exh.

20) is taken up for hearing today itself. The document which is sought to be filed on record, was already already filed on

record by the respondent no.1, along with the written statement. It appears that the Application filed by the election petitioner by way of abundant precaution inasmuch as the said document is coming on record not only from the side of the respondent no.1 but also from the side of the election petitioner. Since the document is already on record, the Application can be allowed as it will not cause any prejudice or inconvenience to the respondent no.1. Hence, the Application (Exh.20) is allowed and is disposed of. The document i.e. Deed of reconstruction of the partnership change in constitution, is taken on record and is marked as article 'A' presently.

Stand over to 23.09.2016.

JUDGE sahare

C E R T I F I C A T E "

and correct copy of original signed Judgment/Order." Uploaded by: N.B.Sahare P.S.

Uploaded on: 02.09.2016.