← Library
Bombay High CourtCAW/2235/2024ca disposed off

Mah. State Road Transport Corporation Thr. Its Divnsl Controller And ANR v. Jaiprakash S/O Gulabrao Giramkar

2024-11-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare1 pages

2024:BHC-NAG:12550 1 caw 2171 & 2235.2024.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

Civil Application (CAW) Nos. 2171 and 2235 of 2024 in Writ Petition No. 897 of 2011 [M.S.R.T.C., through its Divisional Controller, Yavatmal and anr. ..vs.. Jaiprakash Gulabrao Giramkar] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. A. S. Mehadia, Advocate for the petitioners/applicants in CAW 2171/24 Mr. C. V. Jagdale, Advocate for respondent/applicant in CAW 2235/24 CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE J.

DATED : 18-11-2024 Not on board. Taken on board.

Both the counsels submit that Civil Application Nos. 2171 and 2235 of 2024 are for recalling order dated 14-8-2024 directing both the parties to deposit costs for not arguing the matter on that day. These applications are not decided while deciding the petition.

It appears that inadvertently, these applications have been not decided. Since the counsels have argued the petition and the petition is finally decided, there appears no reason why should the request made in the applications should not be granted. The applications are accordingly allowed. Order dated 14-8-2024 is recalled. Civil applications are accordingly disposed of. (Anil L. Pansare, J.) wasnik