← Library
Bombay High CourtCAW/1783/2025rejected

Vaibhav Rajendra Gajbhe, Thr. Natural Guardian Father, Rajendra Namdeo Gajbhe v. The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Chief Secretary, Mumbai And Others

2025-08-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar2 pages

2028:BHC-NAG:1-DB 999.caw.1783.2025.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.1783 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1467 OF 2025 Vaibhav Gajbhe .Vs. Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order Mr. N.D. Jambhule, Advocate for petitioner.

Ms Kalyani Marpakwar, A.G.P. for respondent/State. CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR AND AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, JJ.

DATE : 20/08/2025 1.

This is an application for modification of order dated 04.04.2025 whereby the Committee was directed to decide the claim of the petitioner expeditiously and in any case, within a period of six months. The period of six months will lapse on 04.10.2025.

2.

However, considering the fact that, the petitioner was admitted in Engineering course and his name is included in the provisional merit list displayed on 31.07.2025, the petitioner has to be submitted caste validity certificate before 04.09.2025 and therefore, he is asking for modification of the order to the extent that instead of 04.10.2025, the Committee shall decide the claim before 04.09.2025.

999.caw.1783.2025.odt 3.

The learned A.G.P. opposed the present application on the ground that, the matter has been referred to the vigilance cell and after receiving the report, an opportunity will have to be given to the petitioner to reply on such report and thereafter, the claim can be decided after hearing the petitioner.

4.

It is submitted that, considering the time which will be available up to 04.09.2025, if the request of the petitioner is accepted, it is difficult to comply and follow all these above referred procedures. We find substance in the submissions of the learned A.GP.

5.

In that view of the matter, the application is rejected. However, it is expected that the Committee shall decide the application strictly in adherence to the time period given by this Court vide order dated 04.04.2025. (AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.) (ANIL S. KILOR, J.) C.L. Dhakate