Bombay High CourtCP/310/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Dr. Abdul Shakeel Sattar S/O Abdul Sattar And 3 Others v. Dr. Anjali Rahatgaonkar, The Joint Director Of Higher Education, Nagpur Division, Nagpur

2016-07-18Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Swapna Joshi2 pages

CP310-15 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.310/2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2834/2014 (D) (DR.ABDUL SHAKEEL SATTAR & OTHERS VERSUS DR.ANJALI M. RAHATGAONKAR, JOINT DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION, NAGPUR DIVISION, NAGPUR) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri F.T. Mirza, counsel for the petitioner.

Mrs. K.R. Deshpande, A.G.P. for the respondent. CORAM : SMT.VASANTI A. NAIK AND MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : JULY 18 , 2016.

It is stated on behalf of the respondent that during the pendency of the contempt petition, the decision is rendered by the respondent and the claim of the petitioner is rejected by the order dated 15.07.2016.

Since we find that some Record & Proceedings were required to be perused by the Joint Director of Higher Education before taking a decision and since the record was required to be called from the Administrator, we do not find that the delay in taking the decision is deliberate.

In view of the aforesaid, we dispose of the contempt petition with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE

CP310-15 CERTIFICATE copy of original signed Judgment/Order.

Uploaded by: Rohit D. Apte.

Uploaded on : 19.07.2016.