Bombay High CourtCP/128/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Shri Chandramohan S/O Bajirao Markam v. Mr. Manukumar Shrivastav, The State Of Maharashtra, Through Its Secretary, Dept. Of Revenue And For

2016-01-11Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar2 pages

1101cp128.15 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 128 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3367 OF 2013 Chandramohan Bajirao Markam VERSUS Manukumar Shrivastav - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Bargat, counsel for the petitioner.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A. S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.

DATE : JANUARY 11 , 2016 .

Shri Bargat, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that after the contempt petition is filed, the order of which the contempt is alleged, has been complied with. In view of the aforesaid statement the contempt petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE svk

1101cp128.15