Shekhurkha Rehamankha v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector, Yavatmal And 2 Others

2024:BHC-NAG:9681 8.cao.1055.24.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO.1055 OF 2024 IN MCA ST. NO.16777 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.18821 OF 2019 Shekhurkha Rehamankha .Vs. State of Mah., through Collector, Yavatmal and others Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order Shri S.V. Ingole, Advocate for appellant.

Shri P.P. Pendke, A.G.P. for respondent/State. CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.

DATED : 29/08/2024 1.

This is an application for condonation of delay filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act caused for filing restoration application for restoring the appeal dismissed for non-removal of office objections.

2.

Heard learned advocates for both sides.

3.

Perused the application.

4.

For the reasons stated in the application, the application deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice. Delay of 992 days caused for filing application for restoration of appeal is condoned in the interest of justice as it is not deliberately caused.

5.

The application is allowed and disposed of.

C.L. Dhakate

8.cao.1055.24.odt MCA ST. NO.16777 OF 2024 5.

This is an application for restoration of appeal dismissed for non-removal of office objections. 6.

Heard learned advocates for both sides.

7.

Perused the application.

8.

Considering the reasons stated in the application and submission of learned advocate for the appellant that, he will remove the office objections within two weeks, the application is deserves to be allowed. The application is allowed subject to condition that if the appellant are not removed office objections, this application shall deem to be rejected without further orders. (SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.) C.L. Dhakate